Nevada Federal Trademark Defendant Opens Door For Roxanne Grinage To File Criminal Responsibilities Evidence Against Eliot Bernstein and Crystal Cox

01/10/2013. 

Mr. Randazza responded to my request for permission to publicly comment or upload his court stamped filed documents in the Nevada District Court Trademark Federal Lawsuit one line, "You are welcome to use anything that is publicly filed."

Today, as I was checking the docket report in the Federal Trademark Lawsuit Randazza et al vs. Crystal Cox and Eliot Bernstein...  I realized that Doc 30 is Defendant Crystal Cox's Response to Randazza Legal Group on behalf of 3 Randazza individual plaintiffs 11/28/12 Complaint whose nature is Trademark and whose causes of action are (1) Violation of Individual Cyberpiracy Protections 15 U.S.C. 8131 and (2) Cybersquatting 15 U.S.C. 1125(d) and (3) Right of Publicity NRS 597.810 and (4) Common Law Right of Publicity and (5) Common Law Right of Intrusion Upon Seclusion and (6) Civil Conspiracy. 

Even though I was never served with Crystal Cox counter claim, I think the fact that Nevada District Court was duped by Cox's purported broadcast email Certificate of Service and listed my name along with some 30 very respectable and prestigious businesses and media entities as so-called "counter defendant" parties, actually works in favor of those pro se litigants like myself seeking to bring our own charges against the Scam Blogger already adjudged $2.5M civilly liable/guilty in the Oregon Federal Court Kevin Padrick vs. Obsidian Financial for acquiring domain names of business people posting abusive and defamatory content, trying to sell them her reputation management services $2,500.00 per month to not publish defamatory content or in the case of Eliot Bernstein inventor of Iviewit technologies uses the posting of defamatory content on domains named for Apple Executives Steve Dowling and Bruce Sewell in an effort to strong arm Apple Inc into paying him money he thinks he's owed for patent theft.

On November 9, 2012, Roxanne Grinage demanded Eliot Bernstein and Crystal Cox remove her/my name from any cc on any email or anything which suggests I have anything to do with their extortive technique to demand money by withholding domain names named for real people.

It would seem that two administrative challenges are posed by this learning.  Inevitably the nature of fair market entry forced by standard access business practice models and progressive minded creative thinkers will always forge community-powered solutions to any market entry challenge.  This market I would say is the market of Responsible Fact-based Journalism.  Yes Federal Court dockets are a part of the requisite research but do not rule out witness testimony and verifiability of witness credibility.  A HireLyrics Standard Access Practice Model Slogan:  "Restore Courage To Journalism....Tell the Truth for the Sake of Truth In Public Record....U.S. Citizens Control The Public Docket Database."

"A new type of Extortion Crime Modus Operandi?  Domain Name Defamation Schemes?"

"Is The Credentialed Professional Service Obligated To Protect Confidentiality of the Former Client Who Broadcasts Defamation Tantrum?"

ROXANNE GRINAGE'S WILL ENTER EVIDENCE IN THE FEDERAL TRADEMARK LAWSUIT OPENED AGAINST COX AND BERNSTEIN BY RANDAZZA ET AL IN NEVADA DISTRICT ON 11/28/2012 because Crystal Cox saw fit to include Roxanne Grinage in a list of counter defendants which opens the door for Roxanne Grinage to file her evidence against Cox and Bernstein now.

 

I believe Eliot Bernstein and Crystal Cox criminal responsibilities with regard to their defamation of me personally and as a business owner inflicted only after I said my individual principals and my standards of community responsibility would simply not tolerate Eliot Bernstein giving anyone the impression that I condoned his money demands made to Apple Executives or any of the other 4,000 people and entities he says are in illegal possession of his Iviewit Technologies patents he says were stolen by some people working at law firm over twelve years ago....Eliot Bernstein's methods for crime solving somehow evolved to become are criminal in nature. 

See how Crystal Cox posts on ROXANNEGRINAGE.COM that Roxanne Grinage is responsible for thwarting "negotiations" of what Eliot Bernstein told me and testified to New York Senate Hearings on the Judiciary Committee in 2009, was a $1 Trillion Patent Loss overall - suddenly grown according to Crystal Cox defamation website on ROXANNEGRINAGE.COM to $13 Trillion Settlement Negotiations between Eliot Bernstein for Iviewit and just one of the more than 4,000 defendants Eliot Bernstein claims has his stolen technologies, Apple, Inc.  How did we get from Eliot Bernstein and Crystal Cox's November 9 2012 email to Apple Legal Counsel and P.R. Executives Steven Dowling and Bruce Sewell essentially warning them that the defamatory content they are posting on Bernstein and Cox owned stevedowling.com and brucesewell.net "will continue unless you pay us some money" to "Reverend Crystal Cox In Love of Light Savvy Broker Search Engine Reputation Management Services Scammer posting on ROXANNEGRINAGE.COM that [Roxanne Grinage is so powerful as to have interfered with $13 Trillion Settlement Negotiations between Apple Inc and Eliot Bernstein - Actually insulting readership intelligence asking anyone to believe the reason Apple Inc decided not to pay Eliot Bernstein $13 Trillion had nothing to do with him and Cox pushing up on Applie like two hoodrat thugs - No.....Eliot Bernstein and Crystal Cox were unable to get Apple to pay them because of something Roxanne Grinage did which is to say on November 9th 2012 "DON'T PUT MY NAME ON ANY OF BERNSTEIN AND COX'S EXTORTION CRAP and NO MORE FREE WORK ELIOT BERNSTEIN and NO ROXANNE GRINAGE WON'T HAVE ANYTHING TO DO WITH WITHHOLDING DOMAINS NAMED FOR REAL PEOPLE."   Really?

Crystal Cox is running around the country demanding jury trials, selling her domains to Eliot Bernstein to hide her assets from having to pay the $2.5M Obsidian Financial v Cox Defamation Judgment; gives her webhost $85,000 a day liability for her grabbing ROXANNEGRINAGE.COM as Reverend Crystal Cox on November 13, 2012 after sending Roxanne Grinage an email "Declaring War", wastes the court's time and tries to bog down the community of legitimate responsible bloggers journalists and business leaders in non-applicable debates about free speech as she abuses her internet enabled consumer audience reach to perform one predatory act after the next.  Crystal Cox and Eliot Bernstein may be motivated by a different reasoning, Eliot Bernstein the cynical jaded gone over to the dark side with the sense of self righteous nous because in his view he has a right to do unto everyone else what he says a law firm did to him 12 years ago - and Crystal Cox is a sad case of needing to be needed - spurned by responsible bloggers and legitimate business people, doing all the grunt work all the postings all the rushed mistake riddled filings, all the lunatic declaration of war - literally the junk yard dog for Eliot Bernstein who was Defaulted in the Docket because his arrogance wouldn't allow him to answer summons, while Crystal Cox stupidity had her spread thin trying to appeal and duck and dodge the $2.5 Million Defamation Judgment in Oregon while she calls out prestigious accomplished legitimate business leaders and motions to recuse the federal judge demanding everyone sign a conflict of interest which is Eliot Bernstein's little catch 22 tool he uses to stop fair adjudication, abuse courts and waste taxpayer money because he and Crystal Cox figure if you just keep naming defendants, five thousand Business Leaders, Law Firms, Bankers, Insurers, Brokers, Litigators, Prosecutors and Academicians who would pick up the phone and make referral to State and Federal Prosecutors to lock up Crystal Cox and Eliot Bernstein would have to self recuse because they would be bound to have a conflict which in Eliot Bernstein and Crystal Cox Conflict of Interest Disclosures they Demanded Nevada Trademark Federal Judge and court practitioners to sign don't just want to rule out "did you ever represent this person or entity" they want you to not have an opinion about right and wrong and overlook application of state and federal laws if you know the person, went to school with the person, your sister's ex boyfriend's niece ever met them at a fundraiser.  You understand.

I'm working on a problem I'm having uploading documents but will have the exhibit evidence I will refer to and enter myself uploaded here soon.  Of course I will only post the Court's stamped filed or return correspondence to my requests to enter appearance of Roxanne Grinage, Sworn Affidavit Declaration of Roxanne Grinage in the Nevada District Court Federal Trademark Lawsuit; and hope to file a separate complaint putting Eliot Bernstein name first as defendant so he stops enjoying the shield of his not so bright junk yard dog, Crystal Cox who looks like she is being efficiently dispatched with Orders in favor of Plaintiffs Randazza an accomplished 1st amendment lawyer in his own right. 

 

Roxanne Grinage HireLyrics Citizens Public Docket Bring Internet Predators Crystal Cox and Eliot Bernstein Accountable For Nationwide Domain Defamation Schemes

"There is an administrative solution to every market entry challenge...HireLyrics is Born To Serve."© HireLyrics is standard access to legal assistant claims intake litigation and law enforcement referral for the previously un-accommodated federal crime victim witness created by official corruption fraud civil rights violations.  Roxanne Grinage's Standard Access Mechanism Business Model Achieved Claims Intake Assessment of 2,060 Federal Crime Victims created by Official Corruption Fraud Civil Rights Violations.  Champions of Patriotism were revealed whose litigation and law enforcement referral data respectfully suggest 11 Proposed Federal Laws to Enrich Innovation of U.S. Economy, Education, Judicial Accountability, Prison and Public Safety Reform.  "The answer to missed educational opportunities, unaccountability horror stories, poverty, racism and hate-based ideas festering into terrorism is the responsible developments of entities that standardize access and standardize services."  -respectfully, roxanne grinage HireLyrics Schematics 2002  "Restore Courage To Journalism... U.S. Citizens Control The Public Docket"© .

Roxanne Grinage Legal Assistant Marketing Careers Project Manager Federal Rules of Evidence compliant Expert Witness Report Services (Document Review * Research * Verification * Referral) HireLyrics Administrative Services U.S. Citizens Public Docket Database PO Box 22225 Philadelphia Pa 19136 Tel.  267.444.0594   Fax.  215.405.2939 TextPlus Voice 856.282.4735     Skype:  roxanne.grinage Website:  www.HireLyrics.org     Email:  roxannegrinage@gmail.com Email:  dignityforthehumanspirit@hirelyrics.org Email:  roxannegrinage@yahoo.com www.BlogTalkRadio.com/Born-To-Serve www.YouTube.com/HireLyrics www.Facebook.com/Roxanne.Grinage www.cnnireport.com/HireLyrics

January 9, 2012

VIA EMAIL AND FACSIMILE (Published to HireLyrics.org Case Study Pages)

Marc John Randazza Randazza Legal Group 6525 W. Warm Springs Road, Suite 100 Las Vegas, NV 89118

Ronald D Green, Jr. Randazza Legal Group 6525 W. Warm Springs Road, Suite 100 Las Vegas, NV 89118

Re:      Request Permission to publicly comment and possibly join with Plaintiffs' Marc Randazza et al, similarly situated claims of Roxanne Grinage dba HireLyrics Administrative Services and U.S. Citizens Public Docket Database, Pennsylvania and U.S. Department of Treasury registered sole proprietorships damaged by exactly the same defendants, Eliot Bernstein and Crystal Cox for exactly the same nature of suit and causes of action as opened by Marc Randazza et al docket report through date of last filing 01/08/2013 captioned below.            

United States District Court District of Nevada (Las Vegas) CASE No. 2:12-cv-02040-GMN-PAL

Randazza et al v. Cox et al Assigned to: Judge Gloria M. Navarro Referred to: Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen Cause: 15:1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)

Date Filed: 11/28/2012 Jury Demand: None Nature of Suit: 840 Trademark Jurisdiction: Federal Question

Dear Messrs Randazza and Green,

Congratulations on Order granting Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injunction yesterday.  May I please have your permission to upload your court stamped complaint, exhibits and Document 2 Motion Temporary Restraining Order Motion Preliminary Injunction and Exhibits and comment on how your claims against Cox and Bernstein are similar to my own on case study pages at HireLyrics.org and also in videos and blog journals?

I am planning to file my own federal complaint against Bernstein and Cox (diversity) from here in Pennsylvania's Eastern District on or about February 22nd.  I don't quite know how but I would like to learn if possible how I could notify the federal court here when I file that my claims against Bernstein and Cox are related to your case and if possible to the Oregon appeal of Kevin Padrick Obsidian Financial attempting to enforce $2.5M defamation judgment against Cox in Oregon.

Your complaint filed 11/28/2012 in U.S. District Court of Nevada, against Bernstein and Cox and my review of the docket report through yesterday, confirm for me that I have first-hand irrefutable evidence against Eliot Bernstein that may assist law enforcement in learning Eliot Bernstein is the sinister coward criminal mind behind a not too smart Crystal Cox who has sold some of her domains to Eliot Bernstein to hide her assets and posts the defamatory content about Apple Executives and now roxannegrinage.com after I told Eliot Bernstein and Crystal Cox on November 9, 2012 to get my name off of email(s) to Apple Executives Bruce Sewell and Steven Dowling that had anything to do with demanding money from anyone based on the threat of posting defamatory content on domains named for real people.

The truth is that Eliot Bernstein is backing Cox because Cox is alienated and ostracized by responsible bloggers, journalists and certainly all professionals transacting any legitimate business.  Eliot Bernstein is the criminal mastermind behind what I see now on hind sight and review of two five inch expandable redwells of printed file materials, a 1.5 inch three ring binder and 2 4.7GB DVD Data Discs, document and audio files - Eliot Bernstein is in fact a genius who, like the Joker villain on Batman Dark Comic Series has lost his ability to reason and believes that it's okay to do to others what he perceives was done to him.  According to his thinking, Eliot Bernstein believes more than 4,000 people entities and businesses are in receipt of revenues earned as a result of patents stolen from him twelve years ago by the law firm he and his inventor team hired to register the patents as they created the internet technology inventions.

I am not too worried about Crystal Cox because as my husband pointed out she is just running all over the country abusing internet consumer audience reach to pick one fight after the next with anyone who won't succumb to Eliot Bernstein's and her extortion by domain defamation schemes.  She is spread way too thin and has not realized that Eliot Bernstein sits back comfortably watching her go on one kamikaze mission after the next: Defamation of Obsidian Financial people, Defamation of Apple Executives; Defamation of People and their families even children are fair game for Cox; offering to not defame people if you pay her $2,500 per month for reputation management services; breaking all kinds of laws like practicing law without a license....Cox speaks in court pleadings in pro se voice for herself but represents Eliot Bernstein Iviewit interests as well.  I noticed in the docket report that Eliot Bernstein was served summons and his answer to your complaint was due 01/05/12.  I guess Ms. Crystal Cox $2.5M Defamation Judgment Scam Blogger is also Eliot Bernstein's attorney representation as well? [sarcasm].

My ethical and moral motivation is to bring Eliot Bernstein accountable to the community of federal crime victim pro se litigants for Eliot's defamation tantrum which deliberately sabotaged the copyright infringement litigation of our mutual friend who Eliot convinced to file on 12/28/12, a non-compliant objectionable ("sham") opposition to motion for summary judgment and avoid any reference to the meat of his case researched verified and document production performed by me as the pro se litigant's consultant agreement contracted legal assistant:  four motions, declarations and 10 court stamped evidentiary compliant exhibits e-filed 11/30/12, 12/01/12 and 12/05/12, I had marked itemized and court stamped without any objections whatsoever by adverse party lawyers to this date.  Motions I prepared for pro se litigant were denied in part and granted in part. 

 

Eliot Bernstein used his rage against me because I wouldn't go along with his extortion scheme with Crystal Cox against Apple executives Steven Dowling and Bruce Sewell, to call my copyright infringement pro se litigant client, a person who he referred to me as a client on September 2, 2012, but who he shared a long time friendship with and inflicted a defamation tantrum upon an already stressed pro se litigant who was trying desperately to stay alive in a federal copyright infringement docket while he searched for an attorney to help in time for trial scheduled March 2013.  Eliot Bernstein used his friendship with this client of Roxanne Grinage to pressure the copyright infringement plaintiff litigant to not use me as his legal secretary for the opposition filing which the Motion for Extension of Time to Reply prepared by me was Granted by the Federal Judge due 12/28/12.

The federal copyright infringement non-attorney represented plaintiff, a creative musician, entered a heartfelt, honest kind of stream of consciousness reply in opposition to defendants' motion for summary judgment and took Eliot Bernstein's advice not to use or refer to any of my work, the exhibit evidence we had already brought to the attention of the court already in the docket and never objected to. 

Eliot Bernstein's malicious self centered defamation tirade (bugging my client to not work with me), caused my pro se client's opposition and declaration to be objectionable with evidentiary evidence of "sham", heightens the chances defense will win summary judgment (dismissal with prejudice) and places terrible stress on the musician plaintiff, his family, undermines the effectiveness of a related personal injury federal lawsuit filed in another district court same day 12/28/12 (exclusively researched verified case initiation documents and exhibits produced by Roxanne Grinage Legal Assistant HireLyrics Administrative Services); and inflicts severe damages to my business' ability to recoup investment of costs, payment for work product advanced and professional reputation; especially inasmuch as I am demonstrating a prototype of an invention of reform business method which I tout to Department of Justice for funding to help crime victims in each state.

Please don't be discouraged if you have problems calling my 267 number.  I am in the process of changing my cell phone to landline services during a physical move.  Your fax reply 215.405.2939 or email reply and communications are seen immediately at roxannegrinage@gmail.com and roxannegrinage@yahoo.com.

You are welcome and encouraged to use this correspondence in any way you see fit and I have disclosed here that I am publishing this letter request for your permission on my case study pages at HireLyrics.org.  Of course, I will wait for your reply before publishing anything else related to your litigation against Cox and Bernstein.

Respectfully,
/s/
Roxanne Grinage

Roxanne Grinage Utilizes State Court Document Production Filing Opporunities In CPS Custody Matters to Prime Class Action People of Alaska vs State of Alaska DHHS OCS OPA DOC

Career Portfolio:  Transportable Skills Credentials and Professional Achievements Roxanne Grinage Legal Assistant Project Manager Administrative Solutions Innovate Reform U.S. Economy, Education, Judicial Accountability, Prison & Public Safety Reform
Roxanne Grinage’s Standard Access Mechanism Business Model Achieved Claims Intake Assessment of 2,060 Federal Crime Victims created by Official Corruption Fraud Civil Rights Violations.  Champions of Patriotism were revealed whose litigation and law enforcement referral data respectfully suggest 11 Proposed Federal Laws to Enrich Innovation of U.S. Economy, Education, Judicial Accountability, Prison and Public Safety Reform.		HireLyrics is standard access to legal assistant claims intake litigation and law enforcement referral for the previously un-accommodated federal crime victim witness created by official corruption fraud civil rights violations. "The answer to missed educational opportunities, unaccountability horror stories, poverty, racism and hate-based ideas festering into terrorism is the responsible developments of entities that standardize access and standardize services."  -respectfully, roxanne grinage HireLyrics Schematics 2002.
HireLyrics Administrative Solutions Tools and Teaching Segments Developed and Demonstrated By Roxanne Grinage, Legal Assistant Marketing Careers Project Manager
Quality of Life Benefit	Vision, Strategy, Planning and Implementation
Create Fair Holistic Global Market Place Competition to Reveal Superior Quality Consumer Products for Industry Buyers	"There Is An Administrative Solution for Every Market Entry Challenge...© HireLyrics™ is Born to Serve!"© U.S. economy enriching career contributions are blocked by legal or agency policy malpractice.  A business or professional service should serve in community trenches in order to measure by standard access and community powered synergy, market entry challenges; count growing jurisdictional and similarly situated claims, and document specialized interest groups, characteristics, deficiencies and attributes of the American working class student impoverished federal crime victim created by official corruption fraud civil rights violations.
Enable Fair Holistic Market Place Entry for previously un-accommodated Worldwide Population of Disadvantaged Creators.©	"Survive and Hold On Is a Business Rationale...©  It's Not Welfare or Charity If A Professional Service Advances Costs Necessary to Unlock Economy Enriching Contribution."© The sound business model utilized by contingency agreements which glean percentage share of revenues earned as a result of the professional service's competitively rendered administrative support in addition to recouping costs, should be applied to an internet community presenting population of Americans  spanning every profession, race, religion, gender, age... whose day to day struggle to provide basic needs precludes the American entrepreneur or head of household holder of untapped claims and economy enriching career contributions from seeking fair entry into industry buyer markets, litigation or law enforcement.
Administrative Solutions Series Born Developed & Demonstrated	DOCUMENTS EXHIBITS AND NOTICES PREPARED BY ROXANNE GRINAGE COURTS AND LAW ENFORCEMENT STAMPED FILED RECEIVED Proprietary Research, Verifications, Trial Prep, Document and Exhibit Production Performed by Roxanne Grinage, Legal Assistant, Marketing, Careers, Project Manager for Pro Se Litigant Federal Crime Witness Claimants created by Official Corruption Fraud Civil Rights Violations.
	Grandparents' Motions to Intervene in Custody Disputes are almost always denied because A family member coming forward to claim their loved one in need of care is counterproductive to the maximized DHHS contractor interests of the employees whose job security depends on Federal Funding coming to their DHHS OCS DHS CYS OCS ACS agency. Roxanne Grinage anticipates exhausting every lawful remedy for claims verified created by official corruption fraud and civil rights violations. Even though State Court practitioners work hand in hand with the attorney general offices who represent the fraud petitions for emergency custody or involuntary termination of parental rights usually work to facilitate the State Revenue Generating Billing Interests of the CPS DHHS OCS agency, THE FEDERAL CRIME WITNESS CLAIMANT CAN USE STATE COURT DOMESTIC RELATIONS DIVISIONS OR PROBATE DIVISION LAWFUL FILING OPPORTUNITIES TO DOCUMENT THEFT CLAIMS OF ASCENDANT AND DESCENDANT ESTATE HOLDERS for use in future federal class actions about Theft and Fraud or Personal Injury and for recording into Federal and other Public Records the truth about the Kidnapped for Profit Injured Person: Child Disabled or Aging. SEP 27 2011 Alaska Trial Courts Palmer Inuit Native Alaskan Roger Silook Executor of his own Estate Patriarch Grandparent Emergency Motion Intervene Modify Custody Motion Compel Discovery Counterclaim.pdf   Example of Utilizing State Court Trial Brief Filing Opportunities as a Litigation Plan Strategy Which Anticipates Proving Malpractice of State and U.S. Statutes in Federal Courts with Objective to Reverse Nullify and Rescind State Court Malpractice Child Abuse Orders. JULY 18 2012 BEST INTEREST OF CHILD AFFIDAVIT AND MEMORANDUM In The Superior Court For The State of Alaska Third Judicial District at Anchorage: Identifies State of Alaska Agency OCS Employees who committed Perjury Falsification of Case Reports Conspiracy To Kidnap for Profit and Violations of Alaska State Legislature House Majority Leader Representative John Coghill Sponsored Signed Into Law by Governor Frank Murkowski on June 30, 2005, House Bill 53 (HB 53): Children In Need of Aid/Adoption/Guardian Signed Into Law Chapter 64 SLA 05. The Trial Brief prepared by Roxanne Grinage HireLyrics Administrative Services for the pro se litigant created by official corruption fraud and civil rights violations is rendered onto the official form of the Court found at the court's official website. The Trial Brief Itemizes Mother's Plan in her children's best interest which is forced to protect three children of Alaska Inuit Native Estate Silook from further separation trauma, medical error, lost education about culture and heritage, beatings and sexual abuse injuries imposed by specified OCS workers' deliberate malpractice to further the billing interests of State of Alaska OCS contractors and State Licensed Behavioral Health practitioners. This particular Trial Brief recounts the OCS employees first child endangerment decision to place Shannon Silook's son with his mentally unstable father and the father's mentally unstable family. The Trial Brief is written after the Father's self destructive and domestic violence conducts resulted in his suicide and OCS Employees held a Planning Meeting which did nothing more than prolong child endangerment risk for Shannon Silook's son by indulging OCS employee unproven defamation and false allegations against maternal grandfather to keep the trauma injured child who discovered his father's body with the same people who in the same environments where chronic mental illness was suffered by the deceased father and his family. Exhibits include digital date stamped photos which refute OCS employees false statements that mother had not seen in her son in over a year; HB 53 signed into law by Governor Murkowski the OCS employees were in violation of;, Police Forensics interviews of the Shannon Silook's daughter and son suppressed by OCS employee misconduct, The mother litigant's Description of OCS Investigation itemizing deficiencies and falsification of data including telephone records; OCS TDM MEETING TRESPASS TRIBAL JURISDICTIONS IN ANCHORAGE PALMER AND GAMBELL, ALASKA, the Deceased Father's Obituary as published in Anchorage Daily News; Out of Home Case Plan of OCS Worker Natasha Goff; APPENDIX A Identified the Alaska Department of Social Services Employee Database Information for each OCS Employee who evidence showed are criminally responsible for having caused personal injury and disability to children of Silook Estate: Sharon Chambers, Raymond Edwards, Samuel Aregood, Reynaga-Pena, Ruben and Natasha Goff; APPENDIX B itemizes Alaska State Statutes violated by OCS employee misconduct for which said employees are without immunity: Alaska Statutes Section 11.56.220 Proof of Guilt; AS 09.50.010. Acts or Omissions Constituting Contempt; AS 09.50.040. Indemnification of Party Aggrieved; AS 09.50.175. Admissibility of Evidence to Prove Nuisance. ROXANNE GRINAGE DOCUMENT PRODUCTION INCLUDES EXHIBITS WHICH SHOW EXISTING POLICIES AND PROCEDURES FOR MEASURING OCS EMPLOYEE MISCONDUCT: GUIDELINES FOR THE MULTIDISCIPLINARY RESPONSE TO CHILD ABUSE IN ALASKA, A Project of the Alaska Children's Justice Act Task Force; Social Services Follow Up Roles and Responsibilities; Role of Guardian Ad Litem; Cultural Considerations Regarding Mental Health Evaluation and Treatment; Records Handling and Storage; EXHIBITS Include ALASKA FORENSIC CHILD INTERVIEW ROUNDTABLE, Report and Recommendations To the Alaska Children's Justice Act Task Force, Discussions held on April 21-22, 2009.pdf   This is a demonstration of how Roxanne Grinage utilizes Filing Notice of Damages Claims resulting from State Court's uncorrected malpractice of State and U.S. Statutes in both Domestic Relations, Domestic Violence, Custody, Criminal and Criminal Child Abuse Matters To Reserve the Patriarch and Matriarch Living or Deceased Estate Claims. The federal crime victim litigant created by official corruption fraud and civil rights violations files into State Court as a litigation plan strategy to build evidence for successful federal court complaints, class actions which a law firm may take on contingently when claims data indicates a public interest impact. Claims Data extrapolating Judicial neglect may be reported as due diligence to U.S. Senate on the Judiciary Committee as a reference source in confirmation hearings; Notices to Federal Law Enforcement and U.S. Government Auditors, Internal Revenue Services and Social Security Administrative in re Identity Theft and Theft of Person, Dependent or Payee fraud may be reported to block or thwart certain predator beneficiaries of forced or malpractice foster and adoption placements. Standard Access Claims Intake Assessment verified data may be reported to Federal Agencies Department of Justice Office of Crime Victim Assistance and Health and Human Services (HHS) regarding Fraud of Adoption Tax Credit fueled by Freddie Mac Sponsored First Time Home Buyers' Loans marketed by NBC Sponsored Wednesday's Child Adoption Program etc. The attorney or non attorney represented litigant created by official corruption fraud or civil rights violations is learning that Americans can sue on behalf of our Estates Living and Deceased for the irreparable harms caused to Household Finances, Destroyed Entrepreneurial Interests, Self Employment, Public Defamation, Theft of Person, Trauma Injury, Parent Alienation and loss of heritage - knowledge of personal history, physical and emotional personal injury, Disability and Wrongful Death. American working class student and impoverished people don't have to wait to go through an equally malpracticed State Appeals Process. Americans crime victim claimants can go into Federal Court with Claims on Behalf of the Estate of Patriarchs, Matriarchs, mothers and fathers, grandparents, aunts and uncles, incarcerated people whose family was taken, kept, abused, injured by kidnap for profit schemes. The value of stolen U.S. Economy enriching Career Contributions which never found their way to market place entry because the American contributor was injured disabled or killed by a systematic action of Kidnap for Profit Injury can be projected based on case history and family history gathered in the claims intake assessment process of a standard access mechanism: In this Case, 5 generations of Berean Sea Hunters, Yupik, Inuit Native Alaskan Bone Carvers and Artisans with works in Smithsonian Institute the Silook Estate Noticed Damages Claim against Alaska Superior Court at Anchorage and Palmer for Malpractice damages: $9M in JULY 18 2012 Alaska Trial Courts Probate Division In The Superior Court For The State of Alaska Third Judicial District at Anchorage In The Matter of Concurrent Children In Need of Aid (CINA): Son of Shannon Silook and Criminal Cases State of Alaska vs. Michael Ponte and State of Alaska vs. Shannon Silook: Roxanne Grinage research verified prepared Document Production: "Pro Se Respondent Shannon Silook's Objections and Notice of Claim For Damages In The Amount of $9M Pursuant to Alaska Statte 09.50.040 Indemnification of Party Aggrieved, for Personal Injuries Caused by State of Alaska Health and Human Services OCS Agency Employees and Their Contractor Providers' Violations of Alaska Statutes Article 2 Perjury and Related Offenses Section 11.56.210 Unsworn Falsification in the Second Degree (A Class A Misdemeanor); Section 11.56.230 Perjury By Inconsistent Statements (A Class C Felony); and Alaska Statues Section 09.50.010 (6) Acts or Omissions Constituting Contempt Sub Paragraph (6) Falsely Pretending to Act Under Authority To An order Or Process of The Court.pdf   JUN 27 2011 ALASKA TRIAL COURTS Notarized Affidavit of Shannon Silook Attached Exhibit G1-G5, H, I and J. This is a Marked Exhibit Document researched verified and produced by Roxanne Grinage for use by a pro se litigant created by Official Corruption Fraud Civil Rights Violations. The Exhibit Evidence records in the State Court the proof of Alaska State Licensed OCS contractor psychological evaluator medical malpractice in conjunction with a leading national forensics expert intelligence officer James Roger Brown The Sociology Center in Kentucky's work to organize class action revocation of a commonly abused to deny due process of law fraudulent mental health exam, Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory Test 2 (MMPI-2). Roxanne Grinage's research into the similarly situated kidnap for profit claims of Alaskans noted prior involvement by unity of purpose law firms like Jones & Day who acted to help Alaskans in prior class action, recent Alaskan Supreme Court decisions upholding sovereignty jurisdiction of Native Alaskans; and 2005 signed into law The 24th Alaska State Legislature Representative John Coghill's Child in Need of Aid Legislation (HB 53) whose provisions included opening CINA proceedings to the public, creation of a statutory grievance process and state review panel, increased use of Child Advocacy Centers, and MANDATORY VIDEOTAPING OF INTERVIEWS INVOLVING SEXUAL ABUSE VICTIMS. Even though State of Alaska Ombudsman announced "Sweeping Reforms in OCS Grievance Process" almost a year later in April 2012, Roxanne Grinage HireLyrics Administrative Services standard access mechanism had registered claims intake data presenting side by side within a political and social reform climate from Alaskan Americans which documented not only a disproportionate almost genocidal rate of kidnap for profit personal injury disability and wrongful death - but also presented a community, political and social climate whose momentum for reform was also moving at a progressive rate. Roxanne Grinage prepared for filing into Alaska Superior Court the Notarized Affidavit attaching Exhibit Evidence of State Licensed Practitioner Malpractice and Prior Written Grievances to Prove OCS Employee Malpractice not because the Alaska State Court would respond...but rather to build upon, include and leverage in claims intake assessment foreseen growing class action(s) PEOPLE OF ALASKA vs. STATE OF ALASKA DHHS OCS OPA and DOC as Roxanne Grinage was organizing the claims data for same.pdf   Court Stamped Filed Received Document Research, Verified, Produced by Roxanne Grinage for use by a Pro Se Litigant created by Official Corruption Fraud Civil Rights Violations: JUN 23 2011 Alaska Trial Court Palmer Native Inuit Silook Family Answers and Motion To Stay Pending Honorable Court's Scheduling Order Discovery. Answers in Compliance with Alaska Rules of Civil Procedure 12(A)(B) and Motion To Stay Involuntary Termination of Parental Rights Proceedings Pending Scheduling Order Which Requires State of Alaska Petitioner Agencies DHSS OCS Employees to Prove Allegations Against Shannon Silook And To Comply With Alaska Rules of Civil Procedure 26 Depositions Which Will Not Apply If DHSS OCS Agency Employees' Illegal Adoptions via Denial of Grandparent Standing, False Statements, Falsification of Records and Professional Malpractice is Allowed By This Court - FOOTNOTES: Alaska Court System Rules Part V Rule 26 Discovery required disclosure methods to discover additional matter; Rule 12 Defenses and Objections How Presented Pleadings and Motions; (2) lack of jurisdiction; (5) insufficiency of service of process; (6) failure to join a party under Rule 19 Joinder of Persons needed for Adjudication; Alaska Rule 9 Pleading Special Matters; National Organization of Victims Assistance (NOVA) Crime Victim and Witness Rights; EXHIBITS submitted in compliance with Alaska Rule 10: Form of Pleadings Adoption by Reference.pdf   Researched verified document produced by Roxanne Grinage HireLyrics Administrative Services: APR 29 2011 State of Alaska Trial Courts at Palmer and Anchorage Mother Defendant in Criminal and Children In Need of Aid Case. Shannon Silook's Hand Delivered Final Cease and Desist Order To State of Alaska Federally Funded Agency Employed Office of Professional Advocacy (OPA) Conflict of Interest Lawyer whose legal malpractice conducts obstructed justice for Native Alaska Inuit Silook Estate. Encloses Alaska Bar Association Acknowledgement of Complaint and Itemizes Grandfather and Mother Defendants Answers Counterclaims and Motion To Compel Discovery in Opposition to State of Alaska OCS Employee Perjury Petition Involuntary Termination Parental Rights. Also documents conflict of interest nepotism relationship between Alaska Superior Court CINA Judge at Palmer and a family friend relationship of former Alaska Governor with child abuser of Shannon Silook's children. Itemizes OCS employee misconduct, falsified case reports, medical error injury of Silook children, child abuse injury "foster placements" of Silook children in accommodation of a kidnap for profit scheme to ensure job security by maximizing billing of State of Alaska Federally Funded Agencies DHHS, OCS, OPA and DOC.